Skip Navigation

Rep. Lloyd Smucker, other Republicans ask US Supreme Court to revive lawsuit against Joe Biden, Josh Shapiro election policies

  • By Brett Sholtis/LNP | LancasterOnline
FILE - Table top voting booths are stored at the Allegheny County Election Division warehouse on the Northside of Pittsburgh, Friday, Nov. 6, 2020. New data from automatic voter registration at Pennsylvania driver’s license centers shows that sign-ups have grown but remain almost evenly divided between the political parties in the presidential battleground state. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar, File)

FILE - Table top voting booths are stored at the Allegheny County Election Division warehouse on the Northside of Pittsburgh, Friday, Nov. 6, 2020. New data from automatic voter registration at Pennsylvania driver’s license centers shows that sign-ups have grown but remain almost evenly divided between the political parties in the presidential battleground state. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar, File)

Congressman Lloyd Smucker of Lancaster is part of an effort to convince the U.S. Supreme Court to look at a lawsuit opposing get-out-the-vote efforts in Pennsylvania and beyond.

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. Middle District Court of Pennsylvania by two dozen Republican state lawmakers in January, was dismissed in late March. The legislators appealed and also petitioned the Supreme Court. On May 28, Smucker and 10 other congressional Republicans filed a friend-of-the-court motion supporting the state lawmakers’ request.

Progressive legal groups say the rejected lawsuit relies on “independent state legislature theory,” which is the idea that only state lawmakers can set election policies.

“If adopted by the Supreme Court, the ISL theory could mean that only state legislatures can regulate federal elections,” wrote Madeleine Greenberg, a case coordinator at Democracy Docket, which tracks election-related lawsuits. Under that theory, governors, courts, voters and state constitutions “would not be able to set the rules governing elections, only state legislatures.”

In the lawsuit, state Republican lawmakers — including Dave Zimmerman and Tom Jones of Lancaster County — challenged three Biden administration policies, including a 2021 executive order that promotes “access to voting.” The suit claimed those efforts are unconstitutional.

The suit also challenged Pennsylvania’s automatic voter registration policy enacted by Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro in 2023, as well as a 2018 order barring counties from immediately rejecting a voter’s registration in cases where a voter’s ID card numbers don’t match those in a government database.

Smucker, who did not respond to requests for comment, joined Pennsylvania Congressmen Dan Meuser, Scott Perry, Guy Reschenthaler, Mike Kelly, Glenn Thompson and John Joyce in backing the lawsuit. Four members of Congress from New York, Tennessee, Georgia and Texas also were on the petition.

“The President has no authority to order all federal agencies to engage in voter registration, nor does he have authority to order any federal agency to engage in efforts to promote voter participation,” the Republicans state.

In their letter of support, they claim, without providing evidence, that mail voting is “the method of voting that is most susceptible to fraud.”

“The urgency of this matter is further fueled by the fact that we have an unprecedented number of illegal immigrants currently in the United States and by the fact that there has been a significant proliferation of mail-in voting permitted throughout the states,” they write.

‘Frivolous’ lawsuit

The Pennsylvania Department of State, which oversees elections, rejected the lawmakers’ claims.

“The Shapiro administration has been clear that this legal action is completely frivolous, and it was correctly and quickly dismissed in district court,” Department of State spokesman Matt Heckel said.

Mail voting “is safe, secure, and efficient — and no-excuse mail-in voting was passed with bipartisan support in the General Assembly in 2019,” Heckel said.

There has been zero evidence of widespread fraud, he said, noting mail voter IDs must be verified by the county board of elections during each election. Additionally, a barcode on each mail ballot envelope keeps people from being able to vote more than once.

While Smucker and other congressional Republicans warn that under Biden’s executive order, get-out-the-vote efforts could become “partisan,” their own request comes at a time when two members of the 6-3 conservative Supreme Court are under fire for what some perceive as partisan allegiances.

Justice Clarence Thomas’ wife was part of the “Stop the Steal” effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election. Justice Samuel Alito is facing pressure to recuse himself from upcoming cases after it was revealed that an upside-down American flag, a distress symbol adopted by the “Stop the Steal” movement, was flown outside his home in January 2021. Additionally, a controversial “Appeal to Heaven” flag flew at the Alitos’ beach home last summer.

The Supreme Court has not signaled any interest in the lawsuit.

At the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, which is not involved in this case, Senior Policy Counsel for Voting Rights Marian Schneider noted the Supreme Court has already decided against the “most extreme form” of independent state legislature theory in its Moore v. Harper decision last summer.

“This (latest) case is about the proper role of the legislature, the executive branch and the judiciary,” Schneider said. The executive branch is able to implement statutes by executive order, she added, and the legislature “can enact laws if they don’t like something the executive is doing.”

Schneider said the case was dismissed because individual legislators “do not have standing to assert an alleged injury” to the whole state general assembly. “Moreover, nothing in the executive order prevents the Legislature from enacting laws on the topic of voter registration.”

The May 28 friend-of-the-court motion came the same day secretaries of state from West Virginia, Arkansas, Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, New Hampshire, Tennessee and Wyoming submitted similar amicus briefs.

Another motion of support was filed by the Claremont Institute’s Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence. The California-based conservative think tank has close ties to former President Donald Trump. Its then-senior fellow John Eastman was criminally indicted alongside Trump and others for allegedly attempting to subvert the 2020 presidential election result in Georgia.

In addition, a number of groups dedicated to reviewing elections filed motions of support. These include Michigan Fair Elections, Wisconsin Voter Alliance and PA Fair Elections.

This reporter’s work is funded by the Lancaster County Local Journalism Fund. For more information, or to make a contribution, please visit lanc.news/supportlocaljournalism.

Support for WITF is provided by:

Become a WITF sponsor today »

Support for WITF is provided by:

Become a WITF sponsor today »

Up Next
Regional & State News

Central Pa. bridge named after hometown Medal of Honor Recipient