This undated electron microscope image made available by the U.S. National Institutes of Health in February 2020 shows the Novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, yellow, emerging from the surface of cells, blue/pink, cultured in the lab. Also known as 2019-nCoV, the virus causes COVID-19. The sample was isolated from a patient in the U.S.
NIAID-RML via AP
NIAID-RML via AP
This undated electron microscope image made available by the U.S. National Institutes of Health in February 2020 shows the Novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, yellow, emerging from the surface of cells, blue/pink, cultured in the lab. Also known as 2019-nCoV, the virus causes COVID-19. The sample was isolated from a patient in the U.S.
What you should knowWith our coronavirus coverage, our goal is to equip you with the information you need. Rather than chase every update, we’ll try to keep things in context and focus on helping you make decisions. See all of our stories here.
» Coronavirus facts & FAQ
» Day-by-day look at coronavirus disease cases in Pa.
» It’s time to get serious about social distancing. Here’s how.
Robots have long been used to tackle dangerous and dirty jobs. But during a pandemic, even everyday tasks outside the home carry a risk, especially for the elderly or those with underlying medical conditions.
A group of roboticists co-wrote an editorial detailing some of the ways that robots could be useful in combatting COVID-19. Robots could be used to transport medicine and food to patients in hospitals, or deliver groceries to those unable to leave their homes.
“They can help separate the patient from the caregiver, because right now the patient is really contagious,” said Howie Choset, professor of robotics at Carnegie Mellon University and a co-author of the editorial.
He said he’s received numerous calls from physicians asking if he has a robot that could help them. Choset said that while he’d love to help build robots for doctors, he doesn’t have a fleet of robots ready to roll.
That’s in part because one of the biggest issues facing robotics is a lack of sustainable research funding. Without sustained interest and investment in robotics research, he says the roles that robots play in disasters are quickly forgotten once the worst is over.
However, Choset says that there is some “low-hanging fruit,” like robots making deliveries in hospitals. He says that even a robot carrying a tray of medical devices from a doorway to a patient’s bedside could reduce the exposure between health care workers and those infected with COVID-19.
Choset and his colleagues are not seeking to replace health care workers with robots, but to keep them safe by reducing their risk of infection. He says one day robots could have a hand in more complicated procedures, like inserting IV lines, but he admits that technology is “still two or three years away.”
He’s hopeful that through this pandemic, people will find creative new tasks for robots, and that there will be a multidisciplinary approach to thinking about they could be used.
“My hope is that, because this instance is so severe, that it’ll…elucidate this clear need that’s been overlooked.”
By thinking about it now, Choset and his co-authors hope we’ll be more prepared for the future.
This story originally appeared on WESA, which receives funding from Carnegie Mellon University.
Sometimes, your mornings are just too busy to catch the news beyond a headline or two. Don’t worry. The Morning Agenda has got your back. Each weekday morning, host Tim Lambert will keep you informed, amused, enlightened and up-to-date on what’s happening in central Pennsylvania and the rest of this great commonwealth.
