Skip Navigation

Commonwealth Court ruling on Harrisburg gun laws could set Pittsburgh’s efforts back

  • Ariel Worthy/WESA
A gun rights advocate gathers with others for an annual rally on the steps of the state Capitol in Harrisburg, Pa.

 Matt Rourke / AP Photo

A gun rights advocate gathers with others for an annual rally on the steps of the state Capitol in Harrisburg, Pa.

(Pittsburgh) — Last week, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania ruled that gun rights groups like Firearms Owners Against Crime and the National Rifle Association can challenge some local gun ordinances in court.

Firearms Owners Against Crime challenged the city of Harrisburg’s gun ordinances, which included a requirement to report lost or stolen guns within 48 hours of discovery and banned the public use of firearms, unless they are used for self-defense.

The city of Pittsburgh has a similar ordinance on the books that requires gun owners to report lost or stolen guns within 24 hours. It was also challenged in court, but was thrown out because plaintiffs could not prove that they’d been harmed by the ordinance. But with the court’s most recent ruling, it could mean that organizations could sue the city of Pittsburgh for its laws, although they aren’t being enforced.

On Wednesday, at a rally outside of McCandless Crossings in McCandless Township, gun control advocacy groups including Progress PA and CeaseFirePA called for state Republican Rep. Mike Turzai to take a tougher stand and call for more reasonable gun laws and push for universal background checks. During the rally, Rob Conroy with CeaseFirePA said it’s yet to be seen if the recent court ruling will be good or bad for Pittsburgh, but he wants the city to “stand strong” in their defense of the gun laws.

“I certainly hope that the officials in Pittsburgh read that [case] and talk among themselves and with the people representing them, and figure out exactly how that might affect them,” Conroy said.

Earlier this year the NRA and Firearms Owners Agasint Crime filed a lawsuit against the city of Pittsburgh for its gun ordinances that ban the use of assault-style firearms, accessories and ammunition within the city, saying they have no legal authority to do so since gun laws are a state, not local, issue. Representatives from the group could not be reached for comment.

A representative from Mayor Bill Peduto’s office said they could not comment on legal matters, “other than to note that the enforcement of the Pittsburgh ordinances are under a court-ordered stay” because of the lawsuits.

Support for WITF is provided by:

Become a WITF sponsor today »

Support for WITF is provided by:

Become a WITF sponsor today »

Up Next
Politics & Policy

Lawmakers reel after Folmer’s ouster